Missy proved it can be a success, so I don't doubt she'll be fine. The writing will make or break it, really. And honestly, I'm more concerned with the change in showrunner.
Statistics: Posted by zeppelinmage — Sun Jul 16, 2017 4:40 pm
]]>
So the 13th Doctor will be Jodie Whittaker. An actress whom I don't know much about besides her part in Broadchurch(in which she was very good). Much like with Capaldi I have reservations about her but for different reasons. Having seen her in Broadchurch I have no doubt she can act the heavy emotional sides of the Doctor but outside of that I'm uncertain if she'll be able to capture the other aspects of the Doctor.
I hope that she proves me wrong as I can foresee it being disastrous for the show and future female Doctors if the first one isn't a success.
Statistics: Posted by The Voices — Sun Jul 16, 2017 12:42 pm
]]>
I agree zep, certainly did alot right. I have a few issues with it but even as an expanded universe geek certainly ones I can let go of. Overall totally impressed with it.
Statistics: Posted by Neshma — Sat Jan 09, 2016 10:10 am
]]>
]]>
]]>
Most of the criticism I've heard about the movie is "it's too much like ANH!"... and, honestly, if that's the worst to say about it, that's pretty high praise, really.
They've already broke $1.5B after 17 days in theatre... they're doing something right.
Statistics: Posted by zeppelinmage — Tue Jan 05, 2016 5:52 pm
]]>
The story was very derivative but I can do that - David Eddings made me immune to it.
The effects and fights were nothing special - in 1977 when Star wars first appeared it was spectacular and I think nothing will ever impact me like that again - at least not in the same series. Having just rewatched the Hobbit - the Hobbit was better.
That said, I didn't hate it, I will watch the next ones but I have to admit to being a little disappointed after all the hype and hullabaloo.
Statistics: Posted by Laurel — Tue Jan 05, 2016 5:09 pm
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>